Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Kates Playground In Las Vegas

answers to my e-mails to "my" MPs

Unbelievable but true. As if they had agreed, I have yesterday and today, the answers given by Mrs Bruning (CDU, MP) and Ms Marks (SPD, MBB) to my mail regarding the "Act Zensursula " get.

And fortunately, both ladies have probably read my mail, because they both complain about the "tone" of my mail. The arguments are ultimately the same, were a thousand times - written down like a mantra. However, I will kundun the answers here now.

Today the first of Mrs. Marks, I have also answered the same again below. Mrs. Bruning, I will answer as soon as it again:

Mr Rump

despite the polemical undertone of your comments on the Act to combat child pornography in communication networks, on 18 was decided by the Bundestag in June 2009, I want your allegations Taking a stand.

I can not understand your assertion that we had in the conception of the law "not to use expert advice" given or the online petition. Rather, just the expert opinions are included in the modification imposed by the SPD of the Bill. The SPD parliamentary group has always been the arguments of the online petition in view and be taken seriously.

The fight against the proliferation of child pornography on the Internet is an important issue. This should be largely undisputed. Also, the Internet is not above the law. Unlawful conduct there can be a normal criminal or civil penalties.

By now decided law was the original bill quite significantly revised and improved, with the SPD parliamentary group its main changes proposed in the negotiations could succeed with the Union Group. We have therefore also the major criticisms that have arisen from the federal hearing and the opinion of the Bundesrat well received.

The final decision has particularly brought the following changes.

first "Delete before locking":
The scheme codifies the principle of "Delete Prior Lock. Then a block is due to the irresponsible Internet connectivity only be considered, when a prevention of the proliferation of child pornographic content through measures against the responsible person is not possible or not within a reasonable time is promising.

second Control of the BKA list: The new rules will
to the desire for more transparency and to establish an independent panel of experts at the Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information. In view of the predominantly legal tasks, namely to assess whether they meet the content requirements of § 184 b StGB, the majority of the members of the five-member committee have the ability to be a judge. The members are entitled to see the blocked list at any time and check. At least once a quarter is also additionally on the basis of a relevant number of sampling, a test of whether the records meet the conditions on the restricted list of section 1, sentence 1. If the majority of the board come to the conclusion that this was not the case, the Federal Criminal Police Office to delete the entry in the next update of the list. The expert panel by the Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and freedom of information for the duration of the validity of the law (December 31, 2012) ordered.

third Privacy:
The law is exclusively on prevention. Traffic and usage data, the difficulty of access due to the redirection to the incurred stop message must not be used for purposes of prosecution. This also ruled out that could see through spam misguided users of suspended an investigation. Moreover, no storage of personal data in Internet providers is more planned.

4th Special Legislation: The
in the bill so far for the Telemedia Act proposed arrangements for the access difficulty be transferred to a special legal regulation. Exclusive aim of the law is the difficulty of Internet access to child pornography. With the new scheme based in a special law will still be clear that an access difficulty should be excluded on other content. The amendment is one of the so many fears, difficulty of access could be extended to medium term.

5th Limitation:
The validity of the law is limited until 31.12.2012. On the basis of the assessment after two years of evaluation, the legislature is in a position to examine and evaluate whether the intervention was successful, to reach a definitive conclusion.

fight with the new legislation we are not only the distribution of child pornography on the Internet, but also protect Internet users, enabling secure constitutional principles and a transparent process. "Play through a couple of nights"

to your suggestion that I should, that I may the subject of "killer games" "a little about the subject matter get," I would note that I have succeeded me otherwise fully engaged in this matter to incorporate.

Sincerely
Caren Marks MP

--------------------------------------- -------------------------------

And here's my response to Ms. Marks:

Dear Mark,

thanks for your reply. I am not a political professional, so I ask my polemical tone of the last Mail to apologize. The whole subject, I am a little emotionally involved, so this has probably also affected my writing style.

I fear though that it does not help, but I would nevertheless not a few of your answers can be left unchallenged and you briefly my views on this, as neutral as possible to tell:

locks before deleting
Sounds good at first, but what is a "reasonable effort"? If an officer once on the page looks, the deletion is too expensive? The law is too lax, and tempted to block rather than to delete. How easy it is nowadays provider to delete this to move illegal content, was last shown clear on many occasions.

control of the list
The Panel checked every few months at random. These tests are still secret. Is this an effective control? Do you really? Do you not also, that the holders of blocked sites as soon as the stop sign on it, move your site again and will not be at hand?

Special Legislation
Yeah, this law can not be used for other locks. But the infrastructure is in place. Some sentences in the area of copyright referred to the last significant effort to block sites. When the infrastructure Now where is that claimants will fail in such processes even more on a lock - and the old argument any more. What do you believe what happened then? Furthermore, in the CDU have already talked about it openly censor other side to lock / - to everyone's favorite killer games. Then when the pages come with unwanted opinions?

All experts agree that the law or these locks that can really handle easily, no protection of the abused children brings with it effectively discourages anyone from the use of these horrific images - but the infrastructure established for censorship. That's the problem. Furthermore, the objections were

of 134 000 voters who signed the petition against Suppose this note in any way. Why else would the law was before the hearing of the Petitions Committee in virtually no time "thoroughly beaten"?

And I would also like to add more: The Internet is already today a legal vacuum. This polemical phrase is really just hollow. Existing laws allow for prosecution of all crimes on the Internet - and instead choose kamp fit a little of the symptoms of certain problems herumzudoktorn, the money could perhaps invest in a better equipped police, so that really happens. That would be my opinion the better solution.

Current Approaches of German politics these days usually begin with the word "prohibition". Whether it comes to computer games, paintball, movies, websites, flatrate parties or other things. Knee-jerk and ask your colleagues bans on this and that. Here, too, the short-term symptoms instead of once arrived at rumfrickeln-term solutions to pursue.

Dear Mrs. Marks, which is very frustrating and raises for me and many other citizens of my generation feel misunderstood and not well represented in politics has become. I am glad to hear that you have incorporated into the subject of computer games - if the so, they have many other members of the Bundestag, in my opinion, far ahead.

Sincerely
Thorben Rump

What Is The Meaning Of The Black Jelly Bands

Germany tour 09 of the FDP parliamentary group - at 03.07. in Wunstorf / Steinhude

(Wunstorf, 30.06.2009) Tour of Germany 09 of the FDP parliamentary group: Great The mobile classroom comes to Wunstorf / Steinhude

The "school year" of the coalition is coming to an end. Time for the CDU and the SPD also set the verdict of those for whom they have worked: the citizens in Germany. The FDP parliamentary group has been awarded with a "mobile classroom" on tour in Germany 09 and asks the people of the Federal Government to issue a certificate. Credibility and demeanor of black and red can be valued as the control subjects, health or pension policy.

On Friday, the Tour of Germany 2009 03:07:09 stop in Wunstorf / Steinhude makes Clock From 14.00 bis 16.30 Infobus the clock is moving with the classroom on the beach terraces.

informed the site about the Member of Parliament Patrick Doering on the work of the FDP parliamentary group in the 16th Legislature and is available for discussions. "The most important thing in parliamentary work and decisions are not meetings, but the most important thing is the people, for our Policy making, "said.

Overall, the tour travels Patrick Döring Germany 09 of the FDP parliamentary group of 8 June to 16 July 2009 on 80 stations throughout the Republic.

more information, see www.deutschlandtour09.de

Image: FDP parliamentary group

Inurl:multicameraframe

50 million for source

I'm certainly no expert on mail order and I do not know the numbers of sources. But stick to 50 million in an ailing company, a company that is barely able to pay telephone and electricity yet. 50 million for a company in a dying industry - the catalog business, a company that the leap to the internet has never managed properly. EUR 50 million tax dollars as a loan, we may never see again are - 3 months before the election - if I may before the English.

I just say "wood man" ... 1999 Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder announced the rescue of the construction group. About two years later, Philipp Holzmann had finally broke. The Belgian Gevaert Group calls still around 200 million euros damages from Deutsche Bank.

Why should our politicians learn from mistakes?

Friday, June 19, 2009

Difference Between Chicken Pox And Fifths Disease

letter to Caren Marks (MP) and Monika Brüning (MP)

Dear Mrs Marks, Mrs Bruning,

I'm disappointed, that both of you voted last night for the introduction of censorship and the abolition of the separation of powers in Germany. Each deputy is required only to his conscience - and so I have to see, therefore, that the opinion of at least 134 000 citizens (who have signed the online petition) is not interested and they still appeared to be nothing on the opinion of experts All of them were against this set.

of your online campaign by both parties so far have been relatively weak, now ladies you can save him is complete - because for the people who every day with, perhaps even live "On the Internet", which I and the subsequent Generations belong to these people are SPD and CDU by now become unelectable.

So you save the money and save any bank or any other company, maybe you can use it to score points at least for the other population groups. Or use the money to buy some computer games and play through a couple of nights, so you might get at least the issue of "killer games" a little about the subject matter.

A very, very disappointed people.

How To Drain Pus From A Finger

What next now? Surprisingly

Yesterday was my birthday. Moreover, the democracy, as I knew them so far buried. Not by a mentally disturbed Dictator, not by a military coup - no, only 389 members of parliament who have managed only 60 years after the Basic Law again set aside the separation of powers and censorship in Germany again to make socially acceptable. Depending on how this decision will impact in the coming years could be my birthday so soon become a federal holiday or a day of remembrance.

And I must say, it's really not fun. It all what we do here actually still make sense? Interested about anyone (outside of the network world) for what we do, ask what we dream? 134 000 or we are nerds, a minority in fact anyone interested. It almost seems to me to be so.

Zensursula Internet is the defining theme of recent weeks - but in the "other" world is the theme seems like not so well received. No matter who I'm talking about, the subject is virtually unknown, and if so, then you stand on the side of Zensursula. So perhaps we are a minority and the majority of Germans are for censorship. I do not know.

What I know now that I think our politicians elite a shit interested and that I seriously consider need as it goes for me, because I feel that my frustration over the impotence of my doing slowly but surely can be eaten.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

How To Repair Ryobi 410r

greeting

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Ballet Shoe Cake Mould

Daddy state fit for us to have

Guido Westerwelle once said in an interview on TV when he get up in the morning and in your bathrobe sitting at the breakfast table, then angry, he is also about high executive pay and discuss passionate about it, but once he swap his bathrobe to his work clothes, that's a topic that he did not occupy as a politician.

I'm not doing too often. For example, the issue of smoking or non smoking. I am Non smoking since I was in the world. Never a cigarette or the like has found its way into my mouth. I not like the smell of cigarettes, the smell of my clothes after a disco visit and Gequalme in restaurants is me fully on the mind. BUT this is my personal opinion, nothing else - and that is very different from my political opinion.

For I am of the opinion that every person has the right to do unhealthy things, things that I do not like that I would never do that I think is stupid or unacceptable. As long as they restrict me in my freedom. No one will seriously argue that smoking is healthy. It belongs to freedom in our country to make things that are unhealthy or dangerous. There are plenty of other recreational pursuits, which appear to be stupid and unhealthy or even total, but no one is (so far!) had the idea to forbid or proscribe socially to: drink Cliff-diving, bungee jumping, alcohol, car racing, and much more.

play Yet our leaders in this area (smoking) and current also increased other in ever more areas than moral high to want to dictate to us what we do have our freedom and what is decent or indecent .

Strikingly, this happens frequently whenever just back to really basic issues in this country no answer is found. They would survive by-theaters where you can seemingly score points easily. The latest coup to come back again for smoking are, shock images on cigarette packs. These images are to make the smoker feel guilty and ostracize him morally. Incidentally, this is an idea of the SPD. Particularly interesting I find these attacks on smoking and always in the context before Tabacksteuer that can at least pay taxes Glimmstengel worth over 5 billion euros a year. No matter.

How about the future to scan at all Formula One cars burning a picture of Niki Lauda, with the slogan "racing can lead to severe burn injuries"?

Our politicians, unable to really Problems of the 21st to solve century fight in side scenes, to seek easy opponents and play moral high ground, we do not want.

They are Internet-savvy users as pedophiles, computer games and paintball players as madmen, smoking as villains, Hartz IV recipients as unshaven parasites of the welfare state, immigrants as a threat to our jobs, people of other faiths as terrorists, and people for Write to die as a human killer. And all the people of this country anyway, potential terrorists and criminals, all are under suspicion, because otherwise we would no retention, no biometric passports need.

We are more than 80 million people in this country, we can decide how we shape our lives, what we do in our spare time. We can live together and develop values and standards - for this we do not need unrealistic politicians from the federal and provincial assemblies, whose only quality rumschwafeln and sometimes seems to creep his ass.